From source data to review,a unified EDC and workspace.

Link source data by subject and sample to reduce duplicate entry and manage reviews and change history in one place.

Example study NS-1

Organize source databy subject and sample.

Keep scans and original files in the workspace, then use OCR and AI to extract values for EDC entry. In the NS-1 example, subject IDs and culture lots link the source records to the EDC records.

Study values in the EDC,source data for review in the workspace.

Each study sets its CRF items and the rules for keeping source data, and links the records it needs to subjects and samples.

Clinical trials

EDC
CRFs by visit, queries, SDV, locks
Workspace
Scanned medical records, lab result PDFs, correspondence with sites

Preclinical and cell research

EDC
Culture conditions, dosing and medium changes, MEA measurements
Workspace
Scanned culture records, microscope photos, time-lapse video

Medical device and robotics research

EDC
Function assessments per subject, session results
Workspace
Joint, torque and gait logs, session video, test plans

Research references

These external research examples illustrate data types. They do not represent deployments or integrations of our product.

A multi-electrode array chip holding culture medium, seated in a recording device

Neural cell research and CL1

Cortical Labs · Melbourne, Australia

Cortical Labs developed CL1 to record signals from neurons grown on a chip and deliver electrical stimulation.

Data produced
Electrode signals · culture condition · stimulation settings
A bundle of muscle tissue stretched between two posts in culture medium, with gold electrodes on either side

Cultured muscle experiments

Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo

A University of Tokyo team used electrical stimulation to move finger joints with cultured muscle tissue.

Data produced
Tissue contractile force · stimulation settings · joint motion video
A brain organoid in a culture well with an electrode chip beneath it

Brain organoid and robot research

Tianjin University, China

A Tianjin University team introduced MetaBOC to test robot obstacle avoidance and grasping using brain organoid signals.

Data produced
Organoid signals · robot motion logs · trial video

Bring scattered records together.Reduce repeated entry and checks.

Read handwritten records and printouts with OCR, and use vision-language models (VL) to describe microscopy images for search. We propose automating EDC entry using the source records and evidence gathered in the workspace, with staff reviewing the results.

A lab bench with a microscope, a laptop displaying data tables and graphs, handwritten notes and printed graphs
  • Microscope
  • Data tables and graphs
  • Lab notes
  • Printed graphs

Proposed workflow

  1. Read with OCR and VL
  2. Extract values and evidence
  3. Automate EDC entry
  4. Staff review and history

Keep source records in the workspaceand link them to the study record.

Use descriptions generated by VL to search microscopy images alongside the originals. Organize photos and videos by research subject and capture date, and instrument logs by experiment or session number and success or failure tags.

Use values and evidence from source recordsto automate EDC entry.

We propose a workflow in which OCR reads record sheets in the workspace and AI extracts values and sources for the CRF fields and enters them in the EDC. The DM, CRC or CRA reviews the entered values against the originals.

  1. Collect source records
  2. Extract values and evidence
  3. Automate EDC entry
  4. Staff review

Check automatically entered values,and record reviews and changes.

Define CRF fields and the scope of automated entry for each study. Automatically identify values outside the reference ranges, manage Queries, SDV and change histories, and apply Freeze/Lock once review is complete.

Analyze EDC data and source recordsin one dashboard.

Build a research dashboard with Webspace. Link EDC assessments, photos and instrument logs by research subject to compare changes and check the evidence.

NS-1 research dashboardNS1-B005 · 2026-10-19

EDC assessment trends

D7 · D14 · D28
Mean spike rateRecommended: 5–12 Hz
128408.1Week 16.9Week 25.4Week 4
Week 4 cell viability
90.8%
Week 4 responding channels
26ch

Gait success rate

Session 36–42
88%ok 37 · fail 5
36373839404142

Keep research data on your local server.Choose what AI can access.

Set access by institution and role, and record AI entries and staff reviews.

  • Folders AI can read
  • Access by institution and role
  • AI entries and staff reviews
  • Previous value, reason, author, time
  • Local AI

Start fresh or connect your existing EDC.Simplify records, entry and review.

Define automation around your research records and workflow, then plan setup, integration and migration together.

  1. Test your workflowTest automated entry and review with de-identified records and representative CRFs.
  2. Set up or connect your EDCConfigure a new EDC for the study, or connect through existing data formats and APIs while keeping your current workflow.
  3. Migrate selected studiesCheck study status, then run a trial migration and data comparison before moving the data.